PLUS: THE MESSAGE FROM THE NASDAQ'S MONTHLY CHART
SHORT TAKES
Markets tend to move from one hot topic to the next. The latest concern stems from political uncertainty in Italy. Any time stocks drop over 1%, it is unsettling. Therefore, it can be helpful to put recent volatility in some historical context.
In 2011, markets were nervous about Europe, as noted in the Time magazine headline below dated September 29, 2011.
As concerns about Europe increased in 2011, stocks plunged in August and then remained in a wide, violent, and frustrating period of consolidation for several months.
In the period shown above, stocks were red on 60 trading days; 33 trading days featured a loss of 1% or greater. There were no shortage of emotional swings for those watching the markets tick-by-tick in 2011. The thick and long red candlesticks above indicate strong selling pressure.
Is it possible for stocks to plunge, consolidate for several months, have numerous gut-wrenching 1% down days, and then go on to make higher highs? As shown via the chart below, the answer is yes, it is possible. From the plunge low in 2011, the S&P 500 eventually righted itself and went on to post very satisfying gains for patient investors.
The purpose here is not to say that 2018 is exactly like 2011, nor is the purpose to forecast bullish outcomes in 2018. The purpose is to illustrate that a sharp plunge, followed by a consolidation period featuring volatile swings and numerous 1%-down days is far from unprecedented, nor abnormal in the financial markets.
This week's video makes longer-term comparisons to the major bull market peaks in 2000 and 2008. The charts help us better understand the probability of good things happening relative to the probability of bad things happening.
A logical question might be, but what about the downgrade to U.S. debt in 2011? If investors were overly concerned about a U.S. debt default in 2011, they would not have been buying long-term U.S. Treasury bonds (TLT). TLT did quite well during the period shown below, telling us the primary issue was Europe.
The high-yield ETF (JNK) pays a 6.02% dividend. The long-term Treasury bond ETF (TLT) pays a 3.04% dividend. The 6.02% dividend is tied to instruments that have a higher risk of default. Defaults typically increase during recessions. The ratio JNK:TLT ratio below says a lot about the market's current perception of the economy and default risk.
The same "we are not overly concerned about a recession and rising default rates" look can be found in the high-yield (JNK) / intermediate-term Treasury (IEF) ratio.
The growth-oriented small cap (IWM) to more-defensive-oriented long-term Treasury bonds (TLT) ratio also tends to side with economic confidence rather than economic fear.
When markets are in an indecisive trading range, it can be difficult to get a handle on who is winning the ongoing battle between the bulls and the bears. This week's video provides some longer-term insight by comparing the NASDAQ (QQQ) in 2018 to the major peaks in 2000 and 2007. The video also examines small caps (IJR), energy (XLE), global stocks (VT), MLPs (AMJ), growth stocks (VUG), and dividend stocks (DVY).
Since consumers tend to shy away from discretionary spending during recessions, but still buy toothpaste and soap, the XLY:XLP ratio tends to fall as economic fear increases. In the present day, the ratio tends to side with confidence over fear (see below).
While there is nothing magical about the ratios above, they do contribute to the weight of the evidence. Presently, the weight of the evidence continues to slant in favor of economic confidence relative to economic fear. How long that will be the case falls into the TBD category, which is why under our approach, it is important to maintain a flexible, unbiased, and open mind.