The Message From The Stock/Bond Ratio

BONDS WERE EXTENDED AT THE END OF MAY

Rare extended look on May 31, 2019.

Rare extended look on May 31, 2019.

A June 4 post outlined an extremely rare and extended condition in the bond market that had only occurred ten times in the past thirty-three years. The historical cases told us to be open to a period marked by bond underperformance relative to the stock market. Thus, it might be helpful to revisit the stock vs. bond topic as we near the end of July.

STOCK vs. BOND MOMENTUM

The weekly chart below shows the performance of the S&P 500 (VFINX) relative to the total bond market (VBMFX) between 2016 and 2019. In Q1 2016, as the S&P 500 was forming an important low, weekly MACD printed a bullish cross that occurred below the MACD centerline, telling us the bulls still had some work to do from a primary trend perspective. In Q3 2016, another bullish MACD cross occurred, but this time it took place above the MACD centerline, which aligns more odds-wise with the end of a countertrend move within the context of an established bullish trend. After the second MACD cross, stocks significantly outperformed bonds. A similar look was nailed down three weeks ago when the second MACD cross occurred above the MACD centerline. The longer the MACD cross remains in place, the more relevant it becomes. Conversely, a sharp reversal in the stock/bond ratio, followed by a bearish MACD cross would add to the concerning side of the bull/bear ledger.

short-takes-market-model-ciovacco-stock-bond-26.png

RARE WEEKLY STOCK MARKET SETUP

The S&P 500 recently spent 18 weeks below the 23-week moving average and then printed 15 consecutive weekly closes above the 23-week, which indicates a significant and sustained shift in the market’s perception of future economic outcomes.

short-takes-ciovacco-spx-23-week.png

HOW MANY TIMES HAS SOMETHING SIMILAR OCCURRED AND WHAT HAPPENED NEXT?

To answer the questions above, we looked for cases dating back to 1950 that featured at least a 15-week drop below the S&P 500’s 23-week moving average followed by at least 8 consecutive weekly closes above the 23-week. Like numerous “this just happened in 2019; what happened next historically?” studies covered in recent months, average S&P 500 performance was satisfying after the initial weekly close back above the 23-week (see table below).

ccm-market-model-short-takes-23-week-table.png

COMPARING 2019 TO 2000/2007/2015/2018

This week’s stock market video make numerous fact-based comparisons between 2019 and painful periods in the stock market, allowing you to draw your own conclusions.

EMPLOYMENT AND CONSUMER SPENDING REMAIN STRONG

The probability of really painful long-term outcomes in the stock market tends to increase when the U.S. economy slips into a recession. Thus, it can be helpful to monitor two key components of the recession equation: consumer spending and employment. From Tim Duy’s Fed Watch Blog:

“While the 4.3% pace of consumption spending is not likely sustainable, the underlying strength likely is sustainable. I have said this before, but I think it is worth repeating: Do not bet against the American consumer in the absence of widespread job losses. With that in mind, note that initial unemployment claims continue to move sideways at very low levels. We have yet to see the upturn in claims consistent with even sharply slowing job growth let alone steep declines in the number of jobs.”

fed-watch-blog-chart-tim-duy.png

2019 Market Action Points To Positive Long-Term Outcomes

FOCUS TENDS TO BE SHORT-TERM

Investors and traders have a tendency to fall into the recency-bias trap over and over. For example, after the S&P 500 closed at a new weekly high on Friday, July 12, it was easy to believe “the bulls are firmly in control”.

ccm-market-model-ciovacco-looks-great-a.png

Fast forward to Friday, July 19, after the S&P 500 dropped 1.23% for the week, and it was easy to shift into “we are in big trouble” recency-bias mode.

ccm-market-model-ciovacco-big-trouble.png

RARE MARKET ACTION IN EARLY 2019 REMAINS RELEVANT

Dating back to 1950, the S&P 500 has only dropped over 40% three times: 1973-74, 2000-02, and 2007-09. In each case after the big drop, something caused investors to change their attitude and behavior related to the attractiveness of common stocks. Major lows are rare and the shifts that occur in the minds of human beings near major lows are rare. History tells us valuable information can be found in rare market events.

A rare event took place between the close on December 24, 2018 and the close on February 22, 2019. As shown in the $NYA50R chart below, the percentage of NYSE stocks above their 50-day moving average dropped below 12% and then rebounded to above 88%; a move that showed a significant shift in the perception of the stock market’s longer-term potential.

short-takes-ccm-market-model-ciovacco-2018-nya50r.png

SIMILAR MOVES IN 2003, 2009, 2012, AND 2016

Going back to 2002, a similar shift in market participant perceptions occurred in 2003, 2009, 2012, and 2016. In each case, the percentage of NYSE stocks above their 50-day moving average dropped below 12% and then rallied back above 88%.

ccm-market-model-ciovacco-short-takes-nya50r-ly.png

WHAT HAPPENED NEXT IN THE STOCK MARKET?

The table below shows S&P 500 performance in each of the four cases that featured the rare push from below 12% to above 88% in the percentage of NYSE stocks above their 50-day moving average.

short-takes-ccm-market-model-ciovacco-table-nya50r.png

DOES RECENT DATA ALIGN WITH FEBRUARY’S SIGNAL?

The push back above 88% in NYSE stocks above their 50-day moving average went into the history books on February 22, 2019. Therefore, if the 2019 market was following the historical script, we would expect to see additional improvement in the market’s technical profile over the past five months. For example, the chart below shows the S&P 500’s 30, 40, and 50-week moving averages on February 15, 2019. The chart shows a waning and indecisive look with the 30-week moving average (blue) having dropped below the 40-week (red).

ccm-market-model-30-40-50-2019-feb.png

To provide some historical context, the charts below show the S&P 500’s 30, 40, and 50-week moving averages during a bearish turn and a bullish turn.

ccm-market-model-30-40-50-2019-1995-2008.png

Therefore, if the bullish $NYA50R signal that appeared on February 22, 2019 was still relevant, we would expect the present day weekly S&P 500 chart to look more like the 1993-1995 case above relative to the more concerning rollover look on the 2007-08 chart.

HOW DOES THE SAME CHART LOOK TODAY?

The answer can be found in the opening segment of this week’s stock market video.

REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS ABOUT RED DAYS AND VOLATILITY

When we see a table like the one below, it may set unrealistic expectations about how the S&P 500 moved between point A and point B.

short-takes-ccm-market-model-ciovacco-table-nya50r.png

For example, to capture the five-year 102.13% S&P 500 return after the $NYA50R signal that occurred on May 8, 2009, an investor had to endure 555 red trading sessions that resulted in an average S&P 500 decline of 0.78%, which tells us falling prey to recency bias can lead to overtrading and disappointing returns.

ccm-market-model-walk-table-short-takes.png

MORAL OF THE STORY

Each year is unique and 2019-2024 will carve out a unique path. The historical cases simply provide some context for the 2019 data we have in hand; data that continues to tell us to keep on open mind about better than expected outcomes in the years ahead, while maintaining realistic expectations about day-to-day volatility. If the 2019 data shifts in a material manner, we will reassess the bull/bear probabilities.